Last weekend I bought three pounds of rhubarb at the farmers market. This didn’t seem to be that much, but the woman at the stand I bought it from looked mildly alarmed. “What are you going to do with it?” she asked in the same tone a concerned friend asks if you’re really going to wear that dress. Rhubarb beer, strawberry-rhubarb pie, and rhubarb-lemon chicken, I ticked off on my fingers. She seemed satisfied by this response (and also proffered the suggestion of rhubarb pizza).

I have a fantasy of someday being one of those people who shops at the market on Saturday morning and creates a menu for the week around the ridiculously fresh things I find there. I don’t really have the wherewithal for that, but I did find a compendium of strawberry and rhubarb recipes from Epicurious so I started with this triptych mission: three pounds of rhubarb, three recipes, three days. Go.

Day 1: Rhubarb beer. The first pound of rhubarb went into a mild ale after being boiled down. There’s something about brewing beer that feels like it’s from another time–something about the huge pot bubbling on the stove for hours, the pungent smell that hangs heavy throughout the house–it conjures a strange amalgam of a sacrifical offering, a witch’s brew and a factory (it’s the smell–it reminds me of the corn processing plants my father used to work at when I was a little kid). The beer is a week away from being bottled and three from being ready to drink, and is tentatively named Moulin Rhubarb.

Day 2: Strawberry-rhubarb pie. I woke up the next morning early to make the pie crust before heading out for the day and was immediately screwed. I realized I have no idea what consistency or even appearance a pie crust dough should have. So I did the best I could and threw it in the fridge and forgot about it (and the sugar that was supposed to go in it). The filling was almost criminally easy to make, but the lattice work top nearly killed me. I laughed out loud at the stage direction “decoratively crimp the edges.” I popped it in the oven and checked the recipe to see how long it needed to bake. My jaw hit the table–two hours. I looked at the clock on the stove. I had a meeting to be back in two hours. So I cranked up the oven temperature and sat down with my friend Stephen Hawking.

There are few things better in the world than the smell of a fresh pie baking while you are learning about the fate of the universe. It’s suspenseful reading, let me tell you. I had gotten to the auspiciously titled chapter, “The Origin and Fate of the Universe,” ostensibly the point in the book where I was about to find out whether the universe is going to start contracting again and entropy will start working backwards. (Spoiler alert: if we start remembering the future, we might be in trouble. Or fucking fantastic. Or living in imaginary time. Or all of the above.)

There is an iteration of the universe that I love–the version of the universe that takes us into imaginary time. Stephen writes: “There would be no singularities at which the laws of science broke down and no edge of space-time at which one would have to appeal to God or some new law to set the boundary conditions for space-time…The universe would be completely self-contained and not affected by anything outside itself. It would neither be created or destroyed. It would just BE.”

That passage transforms the scientific definition of the universe into the linguistic definition of the name of God in the old testament–a version of the verb to be : “I AM WHO AM.” I’m not religious but that makes my spine tingle with delight.

At this point, however, I have forced the pie to bake in an hour and a half and zip to my meeting, leaving it to cool. The pie turns out pretty deliciously, although it doesn’t retain its shape as pie in taking it out of the dish, and the crust is too heavy (so I’m in the market for crust recipes if you have a favorite).

Day 3: Rhubarb-lemon chicken. Another two and a half hour recipe. (Seriously, who has time for this? Apparently I do.) The rhubarb stuffing is easy to make but getting it into the chicken breast pocket I have created with my fingers gives me a new appreciation for the phrase, “it gets under my skin.” Somehow the sauce turns out more chutney than sauce–it’s definitely not a liquid, but it’s sweet and tart and edible so I’m not worrying about it. While everything is coalescing I finish the brief history of time (which is succinct considering how long time has been around). Now that I know what was happening in quantum/astrophysics in 1988 I should get caught up on what’s been going on because hopefully they’ve made a few strides in the last 24 years (I was incorrect in my last post; the book was published the year after I was born). The lemon-rhubarb chicken turned out really well although I still don’t really understand how to use herbs and I bet that would have made it even better.

I’m trying to reconcile the workings of the cosmos with my rhubarb mission, trying to figure out which one matters, which has meaning. The vast and mysterious grandiose of the universe or succulent worldly appetites? Do they have anything in common? What would these two say to each other if they sat down over a beer, say, on a blind date? Maybe they would just sit there quietly, enjoying each other’s company, without having much to talk about. Maybe that’s okay.

I started reading Stephen Hawking’s A Brief History of Time on my train ride to the Chicago Museum of Contemporary Art purely by coincidence. I have no idea how I obtained this book–I have no recollection of borrowing or stealing it, and I certainly didn’t buy it. The dustjacket is living up to its eponymous duties and has been for several years. Nonetheless, I have been moving it back and forth across the country with me for the past several years and for no particular reason, this Tuesday I picked it up on my way to the free day at the museum.

This is what I have learned about quantum mechanics and astrophysics from Mr. Hawking so far: 1) there are a lot of politics involved. 2) Around the time they discovered quarks, they hired the guy from crayola who names the crayon colors to be in charge of naming things. Or maybe they just called the union. I am convinced there’s a secret union where the trixie who names lipstick colors at Sephora hangs out with the perpetually-high dude who names paint chips for Benjamin Moore and that now among their ranks is the Quantum Namer, a little nerdier than the rest (but it’s okay because lipstick girl has a secret soft spot for the smart guys). 3) Stephen Hawking is a funny bastard.

This is as far as I had gotten (perhaps a bit further) when I stepped out of the rain, into an exhibition called Message to Our Folks by Rashid Johnson, and found myself staring at a sculpture entitled Death by Black Hole “The Crisis”. The sculpture is a bookshelf/altar stacked with innumerable copies of Neil deGrasse Tyson’s book Death by Black Hole: And Other Cosmic Quandaries, and a curator has helpfully informed us via a title plaque that  Johnson is adapting the notion of black holes “in order to explore such ‘cosmic quandaries’ as the meaning of existence for both the individual and humanity at large.” (Thanks curator!). But what’s striking is not only the notion that a bookshelf can be an altar, or the (not very real) danger of getting lost in the black hole of books stacked into the sky, but a caged plant next to books.

Death by Black Hole “The Crisis” 2010 by Rashid Johnson

It struck me that perhaps the real crisis here is: who’s watering the art? Does he belong to the naming union, sort of an odd-woman-out they let in because they felt bad for her because there is probably not a union for art waterers. Perhaps the other crisis is how are we going to find the solution to the cosmic quandaries if the books are in the sculpture and the viewer is not allowed to take one of the copies (still leaving many others for both viewers and the sculpture) so we will all die of black holes because we haven’t found out the secrets that may exist between those covers to avoid such a terrible fate for both ourselves and the plant.

Without knowing why, I felt moved. I stared at it long enough that I worried the guard thought I was weird (another crisis). But eventually I walked to through the rest of Johnson’s (truly inspiring) exhibition and the last piece of art is a mirror. And I looked at myself and what stared back, in giant spray painted letters, was the word RUN.

That is a metaphor that is not fucking around.

So I wandered upstairs and found myself staring at a wall of words. Now I am a writer and a reader and I love language, but I was at the MCA to look at things and Stephen was hanging out in my purse so like, I was about to move on when I caught the title: The 95 Theses on Painting (the predominant piece in an exhibition of Molly Zuckerman-Hartung’s work). In addition to those other things I mentioned I’m also a lapsed Catholic and those words “95 Theses” are a fucking gauntlet of challenge and a mixture of pernicious delight and weird guilt-driven Catholic pride. So I read all 95 of them (which I cannot say of Mr. Martin Luther’s theses), and almost all of them applied profoundly to writers–and many to all artists. They are beautiful, and political, and self-aware, and affirming, and clear-eyed, and brave:

14. To fail interestingly one must try to understand the stakes of one’s endeavor and try to achieve something against certain odds.

18. The continuation of civilization belongs to anyone who has the courage to imagine herself a participant.

41. Feeling one’s own death is the beginning of developing a sense of the consequences of one’s actions.

62. The body of work is evidence of the work of the living.

63. The work of the living is different from making a living, which is obligatory, and a strange euphemism for the giving up of part of one’s life to the activity of paying for that life.

76. Keeping a foolish dream alive makes one a fool.

77. Society has always needed fools: the fool is both self-electing and made from without, by the society.

78. The fool bears the shame of society’s fears. The fool is a scapegoat.

79. The painter [the artist] today is a fool.

I have been having a hard time embracing this role of a fool, although I am trying every day to fool harder. Fail harder. Write more. Write better. Being a fool is an isolating ontological position, as Zuckerman-Hartung implies in her theses and my friend Stephen in his book. But it is the fool who tells the truth to those in power. Why does it matter if the entropy of the universe is always increasing?  Why does it matter that in the universe every particle has an antiparticle that, if they ever met, would cancel each other out? It matters because we have the choice to move through the world with conscious understanding, or to RUN.

Stephen Hawking published A Brief History of Time the year I was born, which for some reason I find meaningful. I have added to my mysteriously acquired copy a dark ring, left from a scotch and soda, that is the event horizon of my own private black hole. (I’m still only halfway through the book, for the record.) But I leave us with this friendly advice from Stephen: “There could be whole antiworlds and antipeople made out of antiparticiples. However, if you meet your antiself, don’t shake hands! You would both vanish in a great flash of light.”

A few months ago, right before Lion on the Cheesegrater rehearsals started, I signed up for a gamelan workshop at Old Town School of Folk Music on a whim. The blurb on the website said it was a Javanese percussion instrument, and both my night and the workshop were free. Walking into the overcrowded room and taking off my shoes per instructions, I realized I should have googled gamelan. The first thing I learned about the gamelan is that it’s a collective noun, like band or orchestra, and what lay before me was not one instrument but a dozen different kinds of gongs, iron pots and xylophone looking things.

http://www.indonesiacultures.com/gamelan-java-traditional-musical-instrument.html

There were a few quirks I fell in love with right away. The instruments have five tones, 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6. What happened to 4? No idea. (Okay, actually I found out about a month later–it’s in the other tuning system.) Also, the instrument I was sitting at only had seven keys–a low 6 and a high 1. I signed up for the weekly class, thinking, not that it would be easy, per se, but that it would be something I would excel at quickly.

I was wrong.

It’s hard to explain exactly why the Javanese gamelan is so difficult to play. I am not a natural musician so I think it was harder for me than my classmates who had, well, rhythm. For the first month we weren’t given music, we were taught all the songs aurally and learned through repetition. And when we were getting comfortable with one instrument we would have to switch. So on one hand there was a constant upending of comfort. But man, even those seven-keyed Sarons? Not easy. I found some respite in the calatonic instruments, the kenongs and kempuls (that latter of which are a little workout running from gong to gong, although on the last class our instructor informed us the kempul is traditionally played sitting down, which still baffles me). I found some respite in the names for things, beautiful, strange-tasting words.

The gamelan is played by listening. There is a drummer to conduct you and a gong to give you structure. When you get lost, your only chance to find your way back to the path is to immerse yourself in listening to your fellow musicians. It requires constant mindfulness and awareness of the ensemble, even when you’re playing the same two or three lines over and over again. I had been having a rough time with my health, and there were days when gamelan was the last thing I wanted to do. (Although once I arrived getting to pound on gorgeous, indestructible instruments and make noise that resembled music was invariably therapeutic.)

The week before our concert we were given a new piece of music called Udan Mas, which translates to Golden Rain. (Not like PEE, people, like SUNSHINE. Geeze!) In every piece of music we’d played before, beats one and three were off beats in which only one or two instruments played. Now suddenly those off beats were no longer there–before this we’d only been playing half the time. And somehow, that made it easier. I began to understand that playing became less effortful the more present I was, which came with the dawning realization of how rarely I am completely present in any given situation. But in gamelan you can’t be thinking about the note you just played or the one you’re about to play. You need to feel those things, yes, but you can only think about the note you’re striking at this moment.

I am trying to be where I am more.

*     *     *

A quick video that one of our instructors took of our class–I should mention that like Wagner, we’re better than we sound:

For the past week and a half I have been having crazy fucking dreams.

They started out troubling–the first night I dreamed my boyfriend left me–but ordinary. And then they quickly became more labyrinthine, more eerie.

The second night, I was on the El on my way to a party, carrying about a half dozen huge boxes. I got to the end of the Brown line and realized I had missed my stop. So I got back on the train going the other way, at which point I decided to look into one of the large boxes I was carrying and found something very small inside–I can’t remember what. Suddenly I realized I didn’t know the address of the party I was going to, suddenly I had missed my stop again and was on the platform, suddenly I saw an actress I know get on the next train going the other way and I followed her onto the train…

It’s hard for me to capture the sinking feeling of dread these dreams cause me to wake up with every morning without seeming totally crazy myself. A few nights ago I was in a hotel but someone wanted to get me so I had to wait up all night and sneak out the back door so I could catch a 4am flight to somewhere else. And when I got there…something about opium dealing. The only thing I know about opium I learned from Sherlock Holmes and a couple of NYTimes articles about poppy farms in Afghanistan.

The reason behind these dreams is not a mystery–I was recently put on a medication that is given to people for malaria (it’s also used to treat a lot of other things as well, and I do NOT have malaria for the record). This drug occasionally causes blindness, and that has been the focus of my neuroses. However, as the dreams have persisted and become more vivid, I called my mother, a pharmacist, who told me that nightmares are also a side effect.

Their meanings are also not mysterious. Shortly before I started having them, I learned that I am about to undergo a major, major life change. This fall I will be moving across the country to San Diego and entering the MFA Playwriting Program at UCSD. This has been a cause for celebration, not nightmares. But it seems completely logical that all of my dreams have been about leaving, running away, not knowing where I’m headed. My dreams and the great unknown that my life is about to become are in a conversation that my rational mind can’t have with itself.

I know where my dreams end and my waking life begins. But these dreams have been haunting me like nothing I’ve ever experienced. It reminds me of that lovely line by Edgar Allan Poe–All that we see and that we seem is but a dream within a dream. In the past few days I have been trying to contextualize my own experience of the reality of my dreams and the ways in which my real life suddenly feels like fiction within the debate over Mike Daisey raging throughout the theatre community. I think we all live in a world of truthiness and factish things (I keep envisioning facts as slippery eels)–and I have profoundly mixed feelings about the disgraced monologuist. It’s hard for me not to believe that several other parties–the translator–and Foxconn–and Apple–all have their own agendas and vested interest in discrediting Daisey, which nobody seems to be talking about.

But back to dreams. To finish up this post let me end with Roberto Bolano, a deeper dreamer than I:

I dreamt that a storm of phantom numbers was the only thing left of human beings three billion years after the earth ceased to exist.

Which is just another way of saying:

…the great globe itself,
Yea, all which it inherit, shall dissolve,
And like this insubstantial pageant faded
Leave not a rack behind. We are such stuff…

I always have big plans to write about my writing process, but in all honesty, that’s harder for me than just sitting down and pounding away at a script. My month in residency at the DCA with Vintage was an incredible gift from both institutions, and now that I’ve been away from it (and away from Chicago) for a bit I finally have clarity about the play and the workshop–the culmination, for me, of the prior six months of researching and writing Lion on the Cheesegrater. At a certain point during the workshop I forgot what the play is about. This is bound to happen when instead of being a living, breathing thing your play becomes a problem to solve, a complex differentiated calculus equation. Writing plays is distinct from differential calculus insofar as there isn’t a predetermined set of steps you can take to solve the equation and a correct answer waiting for you at the other end of the rainbow. My director reminded me that I didn’t have to solve the play by myself, but I felt like I wasn’t getting it to where I wanted no matter how hard I banged my head against the proverbial brick wall (not to mix my metaphors).

I was sitting in a coffee shop during the final week of the workshop with my brilliant and magnanimous producer Michael our conversation turned towards Ernest Hemingway.

Once in college my professor asked the class what writers they try to emulate. I threw his name out and the professor stared at me in disbelief and bemusement before she summarily dismissed that hope.

The economy of his language has an incredible poetry to it–every word vibrates.

As Michael and I were talking I remembered Hemingway’s interview in the Paris Review, when he was asked by George Plimpton how much rewriting he did.

“It depends. I rewrote the ending to Farewell to Arms, the last page of it, 39 times before I was satisfied.”

“Was there some technical problem there? What was it that had stumped you?”

“Getting the words right.”

A week after our final presentation at the DCA I was having dinner with a friend, and over our Algerian crepes she made a few observations about the script and the clouds just parted. She reminded me that the play is about a group of women doing something dangerous because they believe in their cause–peace–enough to risk their lives and an outsider who finds her voice in the process of telling their story. Everything else–the noir, the gender dysphoria–matters because of this. But it took the whole circuitous journey to get back to this simple truth. My play and my journey to write the play both fall into those two fundamental stories we tell: 1. Stranger comes to town. 2. Woman goes on a journey.

Now I can move onto getting the words right.

I meant to write this post this yesterday, but it’s been a crazy week at the theatre factory. I’m utterly exhilarated, totally exhausted, and trying to write a hundred miles an hour.

Yesterday I took a brief break from Lion on the Cheesegrater. Not entirely, of course–BUT after another inspiring rehearsal and script meeting I jetted to High Concept Laboratories to play with my Vintage friends in an entirely different capacity–the third annual Sonnet Fest. I’ve been doing Sonnet Fest since before I ever met the Vintage folks, when I was living in Rhode Island, and since then it has become one of my favorite standing one-night-stands. I love that Sonnet Fest gives me the chance to kick back and get in touch with my ridiculous side, and I am still invariably the tamest act of the night.

On our first fling I wrote a little play called Sonnets from Last Night (I’m dating myself now; this was back in the heyday of that website Texts From Last Night–does that still exist anymore?). Last year Lady Gaga met Billy Shakes as sixth graders, and this year I got to explore one of my favorite themes, Dinosaurs As They Relate To Unrequited Love.

I suppose this is the time to confess that I love dinosaurs, but not in the way that I would ever want to do any actual research on them. I check http://trextrying.tumblr.com/ with embarrassing regularity. I like the idea of dinosaurs. I firmly believe dinosaurs capture our existential ache, our questions about extinction, and our fears of dying alone. And scaly. I’ve now written about this topic in at least two plays and maybe three blog posts (sorry, dear readers). I promise, after this, I am done. I will move onto other themes.

But I love Sonnet Fest because there are dragons, Josh Dumas making sweet love to the guitar, Serbian local-access cable cooking shows, and my boyfriend can, the piece before mine, have the brilliant idea that we should cast the entire audience as the Sonnet XXIX-reciting Tyrannosaurus Chorus and they were totally game. I owe some big thanks not only to the Vintage crowd and my intrepid cast, but also to the brilliant video designer Davonte Johnson for pinch-hitting and turning the world upside down on command, and my beautiful, incisive, T-Rexified director Lavina Jadhwani, who was busy saving orphans and didn’t get to see the performance.

No but really, T-Rex trying to bench press is both adorable and heart-wrenching. Just saying.

I’ve been walking around in a daze for the past week–or rather, I feel like I’ve had my own personal noirish shadowy stormcloud over my head. Not the kind that makes you all grumpy–the atmospheric kind, the one that sets the mood. I feel like I’m walking down unnamed streets in an unnamed city, and in a way I am. I started my residence with Vintage Theater Collective at the DCA last week, workshopping a gender dysphoric, all-female post-noir adaptation of Lysistrata. Which is a mouthful. And a mindful.

We’re only (or already!) a quarter of the way through the residency, and I feel like I’ve been writing like a madwoman at every moment I’m not at rehearsal (or the bar, in true hardboiled detective fiction fashion). I’ve been chronicling our rehearsal adventures on the DCA’s blog including our recent our exploration of gender in the play. Last night we read through the new draft–I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t feeling a little worried about my own ability to pull off all the things I’m envisioning, making the play the most deliciously dystopic story about sex and power and corruption and finding your voice. The beautiful thing is that I have twelve brilliant collaborators on this project–with the lovely and talented Sarah Cameron Sunde at the helm.

Regardless, this is the part of the process I love the most and I fear the most–that moment where you realize your halfway through the woods and the only way out is deeper in. The woods, in these metaphors, are always your own psyche. In this world of femme fatales and grifters if danger isn’t lurking around every corner you’re not in deep enough. So it’s time to put on my red lipstick and fill up my flask and let myself get seduced by the dark side.

Of all the terms for illegal drinking establishments that came to be under the Volstead Act, my favorite by far is the blind pig: patrons would come to the saloon nominally to see the main attraction (like a pig or a tiger) and would receive a complimentary beverage, getting along the technicalities of the liquor laws. Not so long ago I worked at a place that did essentially the same thing.

There’s a bar a half a block from my apartment that I have been eying for years–since long before I lived in the apartment, when my fella lived there alone and I was a tourist in his life. In many people’s lives. Now it is our apartment, and it is tucked in a little neighborhood near the cemetery and the tracks, on a mostly sleepy and innocuous block. Nobody on our street decorates egregiously for the major hallmark holidays, and the paint is fresh enough that it’s not peeling off. The marks of dilapidation have not yet revealed themselves. It is an almost suburban patch (I typed “provincial” first) in between two more vibrant neighborhoods.

But our apartment is flanked on either side by two  delicious dives–during the day potbellied, senescent men sit outside smoking and drinking beer, and as the day fades into evening the crowd gets younger, though not much, and indistinctly Eastern European. Crowd is perhaps the wrong word, since the bars are clearly only sparsely populated–although there always seems to be a couple of people outside smoking. For a brief time this summer, one of the bars opened a sushi bar in its adjacent space but the only time I only once saw any clients.

In between these two bars is a shop that prints t-shirts but that remains tightly closed and shuttered during the daytime. It’s enough to make a person wonder whether there isn’t some more nefarious business going on, whether there isn’t something more significant buried under the newly-formed mound in the sidewalk than gas or power lines. The lavanderia across the street seems fraught with meaning, all those washers and dryers spinning their secrets.

Last night, we finally went to the bar–my fella, his friend and I. I broke my toe earlier in the week, so walking is still a little difficult for me, and the guys were tired and hungry after a long rehearsal. When we walked in I was bowled over by the smell of stale smoke, a not unpleasant smell. There was a group of people at the far end of the bar, and a few women sitting at a table in the middle of the bar, so we slipped into a booth near the door. There was low music and round mirrors suspended from the ceiling pointing straight down, so that the floor could touch up its rouge and mascara when it got stepped on, which didn’t seem too often. We asked if they served food and we swear she said “only microwavable” but she was softspoken and might have said “only appetizers.” Chicken fingers were the only edible and available thing on the menu, so the guys ordered that. There was a fish tank jutting out from the wall over the heads of the middle group of women, which we speculated was the source of the sushi. It wasn’t really exciting, and yet it didn’t disappoint.

O blind pig, you thing of tarnished beauty.

Siren song of the disenchanted.

Beacon for the tired, the poor, the huddled masses yearning to drink free.

You could say we came to see the fish.

Or you could say (and this might be true) we came to see the barflies.

Or you could say we came to see ourselves.

At dance class on Thursday, I caught a glimpse of a young woman’s reflection in the mirror behind my instructor–red-faced, bouncing up and down, looking wholly inelegant and undignified. She looked like a flapper in the wrong movie, performing, as she was, some unrecognizable bastardization of the merengue with lip-biting determination.

It took half a second to realize I was looking at myself. Two days before I had walked into a hair salon, handed the stylist a picture of Louise Brooks, and walked out a half an hour later with a heavy fringe of bangs. The next night I bought a box of “dark chocolate” hair dye, and as I was standing in the bathroom with the rubber gloves on and hair saturated in something that smelled vaguely like formeldahyde, felt like I was in an action-thriller film in which the hero is on the lam so his girlfriend has to also assume a disguise by cleverly changing the color and style of her hair so they don’t get caught because she too has an obscured but questionable past that will inevitably come back to haunt her and most likely cause her untimely demise because Hollywood still operates on an unconscious but Draconian double standard where the impure, sexually experienced woman gets sacrificed and the virginal ingenue lives and gets the impure, sexually experienced hero in the end. In this scenario, I am totally fucked.

At the dance studio, I glanced at the other women around me to see if they noticed my air of mystery and escape. They were mostly middle-aged women who seemed to be experiencing difficulty leaving the ground for the jumps and the claps and frankly the cha-cha-chas. If God is dead, I thought, dignity is buried at her feet like a loyal and equally dead puppy. They were all completely oblivious to my recent physical transformation, which was not borne of a questionable past but rather a questionable future. In a need to reimagine who I am, who I can become, to try on other people’s lives like wigs and cocktail dresses, this is where I live these days. In a sorely misguided–one might even say delusional–moment, I thought Latin-inspired dance aerobics might provide the transcendental experience I was seeking. But the class is eight weeks, so I have seven more chances for a transformation:

At the still point of the turning world. Neither flesh nor fleshless.
Neither from nor towards; at the still point, there the dance is,
But neither arrest nor movement. And do not call it fixity,
Where the past and the future are gathered. Neither movement from nor towards,
neither ascent nor decline. Except for the point, the still point,
There would be no dance, and there is only the dance.

I think my saucy new middle-aged salsaing friends would appreciate Eliot’s take on Zumba.

New Year’s Eve is my favorite holiday. It combines two of my favorite things: champagne and fresh starts, with healthy doses of liminality and debauchery. But it’s also a siren song of nostalgia and self-indulgence disguised as reflection, and to be honest I just don’t feel like writing a deeply introspective post about 2011. Right now I don’t have any interest in looking backward; I just want to stare unblinkingly at the year ahead.

On January 10, 49 (you read that right) Julius Caesar led his troops across the Rubicon and apocryphally said, “Alea iacta est.” The die is cast. Nineteen hundred years later Woody Guthrie wrote a list of New Years Rulins that I think the stoic Caesar would’ve approved of. Guthrie jotted down 33 rulins, and of those the first three and the last three particularly resonated with me:

1. WORK MORE AND BETTER
2. WORK BY A SCHEDULE
3. WASH TEETH IF ANY

and

31. LOVE EVERYBODY
32. MAKE UP YOUR MIND
33. WAKE UP AND FIGHT

For the past few weeks I’ve felt suspended in that moment after the dice have been thrown and before they land, between the contraction and relaxation in a heartbeat. I resolve to breathe more and (more deeply), use fewer commas, and try to know when to fight and when to relax and let my heart get filled up.

As a postscript, I found in the archives of my old email address an alphabetical list of possible careers. I have no idea if I wrote these or who did or when, but I’m re-posting them here unaltered for inspiration to all of us who are still making up our minds:

  • Autopsy assistant
  • Bartender at the Liberace mansion
  • Cat nanny
  • Donkey trainer
  • Elf at Santa’s workshop
  • FBI Fingerprint examiner
  • Grave digger
  • Hurricane hunter
  • Ice sculpture carver
  • Junk mail machine operator
  • Kitty litter box decorator
  • Laser tag referee
  • Magician’s assistant
  • Nuclear electrician on a submarine
  • Opera singer
  • Parachute tester
  • Quality control/taster for chocolate factory
  • Romance specialist
  • Scratcher (scratched backs for patients)
  • Turkey wrangler
  • Undercover vice decoy
  • Video game tester
  • Wallpaper peeler
  • X-ray technician for zoo animals
  • Yawn counter at a sleep clinic
  • Zamboni driver
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.